The Subjection of Women: Essay by John Stuart Mill

John Stuart Mill Feminist theory / Philosophy Essay

Summary

The Subjection of Women by John Stuart Mill is a pioneering 1869 essay advocating for gender equality and women's rights, arguing that women’s subordination is rooted in social customs, not natural differences. Mill critiques marriage laws and societal norms that treat women as legally and socially subordinate, likening their status to slavery, and calls for legal reforms such as women’s suffrage, property rights, and access to education and employment. He asserts that true equality would benefit all of society and demands a thorough rethinking of social attitudes that uphold gender-based oppression.

Contexts & frameworks

John Stuart Mill's "The Subjection of Women" addresses the significant issues surrounding women's rights in the 19th century. To fully grasp its impact, it is important to explore the historical, social, and intellectual contexts that shaped Mill's arguments.

Historical Context

John Stuart Mill's "The Subjection of Women" was written in 1860-1861 and published in 1869. It emerged during a period when discussions about women's rights and suffrage were gaining momentum in Europe. Mill's political career, including his stint in Parliament, significantly influenced his advocacy for gender equality.

The essay challenged conventional European norms by arguing for gender equality. During this era, women were legally subordinate to men, with marriage laws such as coverture stripping them of legal status and rights. Mill critiqued these laws, advocating for changes that would grant women equal rights and opportunities to participate in society.

Intellectual Foundations

"The Subjection of Women" reflects Mill's liberal feminism, developed in collaboration with his wife Harriet Taylor Mill. The work aligns with broader feminist writings by figures like Mary Wollstonecraft, highlighting legal and social inequalities as obstacles to women's emancipation. Mill's argument was a significant step in broader discussions about gender equality and social justice.

Themes and questions

In "The Subjection of Women," John Stuart Mill explores the deep-rooted issues of gender inequality and the societal structures that uphold it. The themes and questions in this work challenge us to reflect on the implications of women's oppression and the path toward equality for all.

Key themes

Gender inequality is socially constructed, not natural.
Marriage legally and socially subjugates women akin to slavery.
True human flourishing requires equal rights and opportunities for women and men.
Patriarchal power is maintained by social bribery and intimidation.
Education and legal reforms are essential for women’s emancipation.
Women's subjection limits moral and intellectual development for both genders.

Motifs & problems

Mill frequently uses the symbol of slavery and bondage to illustrate women's legal and social subordination, especially in marriage, portraying this as an enforced domination rather than voluntary consent. He highlights the motif of power imbalance—men's absolute authority within the family contrasts sharply with women's lack of autonomy. The interpretive crux lies in whether gender differences are innate or shaped by circumstance; Mill challenges accepted norms by showing how society indoctrinates women to accept submission, problematizing "natural" gender roles and questioning the validity of longstanding customs.

Study questions

How does Mill argue that women's subjection is a product of social custom rather than nature?
In what ways does Mill compare marriage to slavery, and what implications does this have?
What role does education play in perpetuating or challenging gender inequality, according to Mill?
How does Mill address the issue of consent in the context of women's subordination?
Why does Mill believe that legal reform alone is insufficient to achieve gender equality?
What are the consequences of women’s subjection for men and society as a whole?
How does Mill conceptualize the "principle of perfect equality" between genders?
What examples does Mill provide to challenge claims that patriarchy benefits women?

Interpretation, close reading & resources

The interpretation of John Stuart Mill's The Subjection of Women invites readers to explore its rich themes and arguments. By examining critical approaches and engaging in debates around the text, one can better understand Mill's influence on feminist thought and discussions about gender equality.

Critical approaches & debates

John Stuart Mill's The Subjection of Women has been analyzed through various lenses, including feminist, Marxist, and formalist approaches. Feminist critiques often praise its progressive stance on gender equality, especially Mill’s condemnation of marriage as a form of slavery and his arguments for legal and social reforms. Marxist readings focus on the intersection of gender and class oppression, emphasizing Mill’s critique of property laws and labor exclusion. Some debate arises regarding Mill's primary focus on married women's plight, which 19th-century feminists saw as overlooking the hardships of single women reliant on precarious employment. Additionally, critiques question whether Mill’s Victorian context limits the essay’s views on gender roles and equality.

Key passages

A pivotal passage describes women’s subjugation within marriage as “living under the very eye” of a master, highlighting their vulnerability and inability to resist male domination. Mill’s metaphor of marriage as slavery critically frames the central argument against legal and social inequality, making clear why the personal experience of subjection matters. This passage's power lies in its vivid depiction of persistent coercion masked as intimacy, emphasizing the need for systemic change.

Bibliography

Mill, John Stuart. The Subjection of Women, 1869. Includes foundational articulation of feminist liberalism. Complement with Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman and recent studies such as Ellen Donkin’s John Stuart Mill: Victorian Firebrand (2019), which explores the essay’s historical impact and ongoing relevance.